- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated Aug 20, 2026 2:32am by
.
-
Posts
-
E.g I like no man’s sky but it’s pretty demanding on my rig. I’m not interested in vr interaction, merely the player or ship view in 3d is plenty. I actually play without the movement controllers unless the game forces me. I feel like 3d is much less demanding than vr since your view is fixed to the movement/look sticks?
I don´t know if I understood your question correctly but you aren´t forced to use vr controllers with vorpx, infact I never have used them and you really can use them only with gestures with vorpx.
Some games I prefer to play in just SBS 3D versus even in a virtual room in VR. If there aren’t other 3D solutions (GEO-11, 3DVision, etc) or those games have inadequate fixes, i’ll use Vorpx set to generic monitor which changes it to SBS on your main monitor (using Virtual Desktop or my XR glasses though a 3D monitor could work too).
I feel like 3d is much less demanding than vr since your view is fixed to the movement/look sticks?
I think the way you rotate the view (using VR headset movements or your mouse/controller/gamepad) doesn’t have a significant impact on performance.
If you don’t care about Full VR mode, you can play with Immersive Screen Mode and disable headtracking if you want (or even Cinema Mode) but it’s not the most important thing.
But it’s true you’ll need a lower resolution if you don’t zoom in as much (reduce zoom / scale).
And so “Full VR” mode usually recquires more resolution to get a perfect image quality (unless you configure a really huge screen around you with Immersive Screen, which can also benefits from high resolution in this case).
Theoritically, pure 3D (without a VR headset) could be less demanding than VR but it’s not always true (it doesn’t seem to be the case at all with my 3D glasses-free monitor, compared to VorpX with the Reverb G2 at higher resolution and much more details).
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.