Search Results for 'Skyrim'

[Dayn]

Can anyone help please.

It works when VorpX is off. But as soon as I turn it on and launch Skyrim (either from Steam, or NMM) The title music stays for about 2 seconds, and the just stutters one of the notes over and over.

I have tried with Steam VR off. HMD black. And with it on first. Just shows the SteamVR environment.
Any help really appreciated.

I did search, but came up with nothing to help.

[Ralf]

The individual result depends on so many things (see my last post above) that a few days later I’m a bit more cautious now. Depending on the individual setup someone may very well come to the opposite conclusion.

Skyrim always was and still is a resource hungry game, that much is clear. For high frame rates across the board you have to make compromises in regard to detail settings with both versions. Maxing out everything and still getting 45fps+ Geometry 3D everywhere isn’t possible with the SE just as it was never possible with the original.

I would prefer the original since I like the original’s look better and also G3D performance was better here with completely unmodded games during testing, but depending on the individual setup, especially in regard to resource hungry mods, textures, models etc., that may look different for others.

[wrongtarget]

SSE Runs way better for me (i7,1080).
Mod scene is catching up insanely fast, and my heavily modded game doesn’t need to deal with any of the previous Windows 10 vram limitations, since Skyrim SE is x64 and runs on DirectX11. Better performance in the long run.

Now just waiting patiently for SKSE and I’ll be pretty happy.

[Anonymous]

Hello! I run the program “VorpX Configure”, select the desired profile (Skyrim), and click “Apply and close” button. In the system tray icon appears “VorpX”, and then immediately disappears. The program does not start, what could be the problem? Videos start attached. https://youtu.be/pbY2NyNkuuo

[NipOc]

Skyrim is heavily cpu dependent / bound.
Lowering shadow detail, shadow distance and object render distance will offer the most performance increase.
(It might even make the SE playable)

GPU depending mods and settings only have a really small or no impact on performance. (On a high end gpu)

[NipOc]

The older enb (injector) versions still work with vorpx.
The same goes for sweetfx (when used with the enb injector).
Not all enb settings work though.

I get around 30-40 fps with enb and skyrim on ultra settings in vorpx.
I havent tweaked any settings but it should be possible to get ~50 fps outside with tweaked settings (depending on the system and luck).

Most “essential” graphic mods, like the flora overhaul or texture mods (not the 8k ones) shouldn’t cause a big fps hit.

For (2d) performance: (i5, 970)

170-230 fps with skyrim on ultra
160-190 fps with the SE on low
90-110 fps with the SE on ultra

(tested in the starting area, like in the beginning of the video)

I don’t know why the guy in the video had so low fps, performance varies, but nearly half the fps seems pretty extreme.

[Tiggerdyret]

Is there a list of G3D compatible games somewhere? Or is it only Fallout 4 and SKyrim that support it?

[Tiggerdyret]

Well, I it seems to differ. Some say SSE runs better than old Skyrim. My guess is that SSE runs better than old, if you’ve got a strong gpu. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRzLgRvqfDs&t=1s

But I’m mostly interested in how vorpx is running, so enb is a no go. I have a lot of experience with modding skyrim to death, but I don’t really want to bother with setting it up if the fps is still too low. I don’t think vanilla Skyrim looks good enough to play in vorpx over a heavy modded game on a monitor :)

[NipOc]

Depends,
The SE runs far worse than normal skyrim, even on lowest setting and without vorpx.
Skyrim on Ultra probably runs and looks better than the SE on low.

The only way to really mod the lighting (except for god rays) is enb, but that costs a lot of fps (40+ fps) depending on the settings.
A slight enb without things like depth of field or strong ambient occlusion… might run better.
A strong enb with most settings maxed won’t.

Skyrim with enb and texture mods will look far better than the SE.
But it’s not so easy to set up and you’ll have to tweak some settings.

A example comparison:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWXfYzQqzDc

[prinyo]

Just tried it.
At first I was quite happy as it seems the Vive doesn’t flicker when the framerate drops even to 5 fps. I would gladly let the old game run at about 30 – 40 fps for the Geometry, but there it is impossible because of the flickering.

However it seems in (unmodded) Special Edition I’m getting half the framerate I have in (heavily modded) old Skyrim.

I did everything mentioned in the readme file. And I tested both 1920 x 1440 and 1600 x 1280. There was a difference in the visual quality as is to be expected, but no difference in the framerate.

While walking between Riverwood and Whiterun with Geometry it was constantly varying between 15 and 35. It dropped to 5fps when I got to the Khajiit camp outside of the city.
The same road on the other 2 modes (Z3D) the framerate was between 30 and 40 fps. It never managed to reach 45 fps.

My system: i7-4790, GTX 980 (4GB), 16 GB RAM

[Tiggerdyret]

So I’ve just tried out SSE on Vorpx and it looks amazing. Only problem is that the frame rate with my gtx 980 is under the limit of what I can tolerate compared to the graphical settings. Ralf has said that SSE performs worse than old Skyrim in vorpx because of how it was coded or something. But does a Skyrim modded to look similar to a high/ultra SSE also run better? How do they compare?

[reanor]

This injector doesn’t really provide any memory boost for SKYRIM SE, correct?

[Fredthehound]

“Are there any changes in this, at some point during these two years?now admits a higher value?”

Not that I know of.

On the EMBoost, don’t fear it, EMBRACE IT!! It is the single best thing you can do for Skyrim.

[reanor]

Vorpx itself is not much of a hassle, it’s finding the settings that are comfortable for your eyes is, since everyone’s eye sight is a bit different even if you have 20:20.

After using Vorpx for a while, all I usually adjust nowadays –

FOV – field of view – in game setting
Z3D or G3D – in Vorpx Console this is Z-Normal, Z-Adaptive or Geometry on 3D reconstruction page.
FOV in Vorpx – even though if you set up FOV in game correctly – having FOV in Vorpx at usually works perfect.
HUD settings in VORPX – this has usually standard settings, but Vorpx allows some curomization.

First and foremost thing – you need to find a nominal value of Field Of View. FOV can be set up in Skyrim SE or regular Skyrim by using console command – FOV (console access with <`>). The best in Skyrim SE right now is FOV 120 120, but that’s again up to the user, some prefer FOV 135 135 for example.

The next thing is to chose which mode to run Vorpx in – Z3D or G3D… G3D takes advantage of the game’s object geometry, so the 3D effect is more pronounced in this mode, but it is also more resources demanding mode. Z3D is more flat, but also leaves a lot of frames for convenience. So if you want faster – Z3D, if you want more 3D – G3D. This can be changed in the Vorpx console on 3D reconstruction screen.

The last thing is FOX in Vorpx itself and HUD customization. Those are usually good in already established profiles, but convenience of customization is still there, which is great.

[Tiggerdyret]

This should do the trick, but it’s for the old Skyrim, which is current better supported than SSE. https://www.vorpx.com/forums/topic/some-help-for-skyrim-offered/

I’m personally waiting a few weeks until SSE has gotten better Vorpx and modding support, but you could give them both a try and see what runs best on your system.