Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
pixelcowboy
ParticipantI haven’t gotten the hook helper option to show at all.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantDo we know if Forza 5 is a UWP game? I tried to run it the other day but it wouldn’t hook (from Gamepass).
pixelcowboy
ParticipantOnly thing I’ve found annoying is that there are edge issues on the halo post if you hide it, which makes looking in front very difficult.
On another note, what resolution/quality settings are you running in game. My rig (3080) can handle 4k no problem on many games with vorpx, but with this game it goes crazy if I set that resolution.pixelcowboy
ParticipantThanks, worked great.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantJust tried the Steam version, it does hook, but I’m not getting any 3d effect. What profile are you using? I tried the only Cloud one I could find.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantBummer, thanks for explaining that.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantI’m on the Gamepass version, if that makes any difference.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantThanks, it’s a shame, I do like the 3rd person immersive or cinema mode in many games more than full VR.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantYes, you are correct. I had removed exceptions when I was debugging with Bitdefender. However, they told me that the false positive should also be fixed now. Vorpx has been running happily with BD since then.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantLike I said, I don’t disagree that their detection should be more transparent. But being a devil’s advocate, they are aggressive as to detect new exploits and attacks that wouldn’t necessarily be detected otherwise. The reason I want it to work is that I was their costumer before being a vorpx costumer, and I had a valid 3 year subscription. I’ve used other alternatives, including Windows Defender, and I like BD’s features, ease of use an system impact. I’m annoyed as much as you are, as just yesterday it borked my update and damage my VorpX installation. But I reported it, complained about it, and they said it’s fixed in the next update. So I’ll try to be diligent and consistent and to give them a chance to correct the issues. The problem is that a lot of users never report the issue so it’s never fixed.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantWhat? Advertising? I’m your costumer and your user. I’m not affiliated with Bitdefender, and I’m just their costumer too. And I’m helping your costumers base by working with Bitdefender to fix the false flags, which should help you as you won’t have your client coming here to complain that VorpX doesn’t work, and wasting your time.
I’m just giving my argument of why I use them, and if you think Windows Defender is fine your entitled to that opinion, I was just presenting the counter argument that many Security experts disagree with that assessment. I’m not advertising Bitdefender. Kaspersky works just as well and scores higher some times. Windows Defender is better than nothing, but it’s not the best. There isn’t any argument about that.pixelcowboy
ParticipantWill DLSS generally not be supported in the future for VorpX?
Jun 18, 2021 at 5:41pm in reply to: Has anyone tried Virtual Desktop’s Synchronous Spacewarp with Vorpx yet? #204772pixelcowboy
ParticipantFor me airlink is still much better. VD just performs worse, as it has more overhead.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantPost removed.
No advertising of for the average PC user largely unnecessary third party antivirus software here that for years and against better knowledge wrongly flags each and every new vorpX version as malicious. Thanks.
pixelcowboy
ParticipantBecause Bitdefender scores consistently higher than Windows Defender and many other antivirus solutions in real world tests. But because it uses a lot of complex heuristics it sometimes catches software like VorpX which does a lot of hacky stuff to work (not bashing on VorpX, it’s the only way software like this can work). However, by the same measure, it can protect from novel attacks. My only gripe with it is that it should never block something without telling you it did it, which was happening with VorpX.
-
AuthorPosts